Recent AG Ruling

TREC Administrator Doug Oldmixon presented a question in Oct of last year to the state Attorney General’s office regarding mandatory E&O for inspectors and asked for a ruling. Read Adm. Oldmixon’s question and the AG’s response.

Click for home page
May 18, 2012

Mr. Douglas E. Oldmixon
Administrator
Texas Real Estate Commission
Post Office Box 12188
Austin, Texas 78711-2188
Opinion No. GA-0932Re: Whether section 1102.114 of the Texas Occupations Code, which requires licensed real estate inspectors to carry liability insurance, would be effective if no such coverage were available (RQ-1015-GA)

Dear Mr. Oldmixon:

You ask two questions about sections 1102.114(3) and 1102.203(a) of the Texas Occupations Code. (1) Section 1102.114(3) requires the Texas Real Estate Commission to issue a real estate inspector’s license to an applicant who, among other things, “offers proof that the applicant carries liability insurance . . . to protect the public.” Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 1102.114(3) (West 2012). Section 1102.203(a) provides that a “person may renew an unexpired license by . . . providing proof of liability insurance as required by Section 1102.114(3).” Id. § 1102.203(a). You explain that “there appear to be sufficient providers of [such coverage] in Texas today,” but “a concern exists that there may not be access to such coverage in the future.” Request Letter at 1.

Your first question is, “Would the insurance described above still be required if every insurance provider left the Texas market and no policy was available to satisfy the requirements of Sections 1102.114 and 1102.203(a) . . .?” Id. at 2. We begin our answer by reviewing the plain and common meaning of the statute’s text. State v. K.E.W., 315 S.W.3d 16, 21 (Tex. 2010). Section 1102.203(a) states that an applicant is “required” to carry the insurance that section “1102.114(3)” describes. Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 1102.203(a) (West 2012). We neither found nor received briefing purporting to find any statutory language or Texas court decisions that would exempt an applicant from carrying such insurance if it were unavailable. Therefore, sections 1102.114(3) and 1102.203(a) require an applicant for a real estate inspector’s license to carry the insurance that section 1102.114(3) describes even if such insurance were unavailable. See Brown v. Mem’l Vills. Water Auth., 361 S.W.2d 453, 455 (Tex. Civ. App.–Houston 1962, writ ref’d n.r.e.) (“In determining the legislative intent it is to be presumed the Legislature was acquainted with the conditions affecting the area to be affected by the legislation.”). (2)

Your second question is, “Does the Commission have the discretion to waive this requirement if no such insurance coverage is available in Texas?” Request Letter at 2. We begin our answer by noting that a state agency like the Commission has only those powers that the Legislature expressly grants it, along with implied powers that are reasonably necessary to exercise the expressly granted powers. Pub. Util. Comm’n of Tex. v. City Pub. Serv. Bd. of San Antonio, 53 S.W.3d 310, 315 (Tex. 2001). We neither found nor received briefing purporting to find a statute expressly granting the Commission discretion to waive the section 1102.114(3) insurance requirement. Instead, we found a statute granting the Commission discretion to “waive any license requirement for an applicant who holds a license from another state having license requirements substantially equivalent to those of this state.” Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 1102.112 (West 2012). This specific grant of authority to waive certain license requirements indicates that the Legislature has not impliedly granted the Commission discretion to waive other license requirements, such as the section 1102.114(3) insurance requirement. See Jones v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 745 S.W.2d 901, 902 (Tex. 1988) (explaining that the Legislature’s naming of one thing generally excludes things not named and that a court may not add words to a statute that are not implied in the statute’s language). Because the Legislature neither expressly nor impliedly granted the Commission the power to waive the section 1102.114(3) liability insurance requirement, the Commission lacks discretion to waive that requirement.>

S U M M A R Y

Sections 1102.114(3) and 1102.203(a) require an applicant for a real estate inspector’s license to carry liability insurance. The Texas Real Estate Commission lacks authority to waive that requirement.

Very truly yours,

Abbott signatureGREG ABBOTT
Attorney General of Texas

Daniel T. Hodge
First Assistant Attorney General

James D. Blacklock
Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel

Jason Boatright
Chair, Opinion Committee

Jason Boatright
Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee

Footnotes

1. Letter from Douglas E. Oldmixon, Adm’r, Tex. Real Estate Comm’n, to the Honorable Greg Abbott, Tex. Att’y Gen. at 2 (Oct. 11, 2011), http://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/opin (“Request Letter”).

2. Of course, the Legislature may amend section 1102.114(3) to make the insurance requirement contingent on the availability of the required insurance. Tex. Const. art. III, § 1. An opinion of this office, however, cannot. Id. art. II, § 1. See also Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. GA-0781 (2010) at 3 (explaining that “we will not add words that are not implicitly contained in the language of a statute”) (citing Lee v. City of Houston, 807 S.W.2d 290, 294-95 (Tex. 1991)).

 


Home | Opinions

 

 

Share with others:
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
Posted in E&O Insurance, Inspector Advisory Committee, Legislation, Regulatory, TREC | 2 Comments
divider

Proposed SOP & 7-3 Report Form

Here are the current proposed SOP and 7-3 Report Form as of 3/27/12. They will be presented at the next full Inspectors Advisory Committee meeting and, if approved, will then be presented at the next full Commissioners meeting. Adoption, if approved by TREC, is several months away.

Click for home page
May 18, 2012

Mr. Douglas E. Oldmixon
Administrator
Texas Real Estate Commission
Post Office Box 12188
Austin, Texas 78711-2188
Opinion No. GA-0932Re: Whether section 1102.114 of the Texas Occupations Code, which requires licensed real estate inspectors to carry liability insurance, would be effective if no such coverage were available (RQ-1015-GA)

Dear Mr. Oldmixon:

You ask two questions about sections 1102.114(3) and 1102.203(a) of the Texas Occupations Code. (1) Section 1102.114(3) requires the Texas Real Estate Commission to issue a real estate inspector’s license to an applicant who, among other things, “offers proof that the applicant carries liability insurance . . . to protect the public.” Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 1102.114(3) (West 2012). Section 1102.203(a) provides that a “person may renew an unexpired license by . . . providing proof of liability insurance as required by Section 1102.114(3).” Id. § 1102.203(a). You explain that “there appear to be sufficient providers of [such coverage] in Texas today,” but “a concern exists that there may not be access to such coverage in the future.” Request Letter at 1.

Your first question is, “Would the insurance described above still be required if every insurance provider left the Texas market and no policy was available to satisfy the requirements of Sections 1102.114 and 1102.203(a) . . .?” Id. at 2. We begin our answer by reviewing the plain and common meaning of the statute’s text. State v. K.E.W., 315 S.W.3d 16, 21 (Tex. 2010). Section 1102.203(a) states that an applicant is “required” to carry the insurance that section “1102.114(3)” describes. Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 1102.203(a) (West 2012). We neither found nor received briefing purporting to find any statutory language or Texas court decisions that would exempt an applicant from carrying such insurance if it were unavailable. Therefore, sections 1102.114(3) and 1102.203(a) require an applicant for a real estate inspector’s license to carry the insurance that section 1102.114(3) describes even if such insurance were unavailable. See Brown v. Mem’l Vills. Water Auth., 361 S.W.2d 453, 455 (Tex. Civ. App.–Houston 1962, writ ref’d n.r.e.) (“In determining the legislative intent it is to be presumed the Legislature was acquainted with the conditions affecting the area to be affected by the legislation.”). (2)

Your second question is, “Does the Commission have the discretion to waive this requirement if no such insurance coverage is available in Texas?” Request Letter at 2. We begin our answer by noting that a state agency like the Commission has only those powers that the Legislature expressly grants it, along with implied powers that are reasonably necessary to exercise the expressly granted powers. Pub. Util. Comm’n of Tex. v. City Pub. Serv. Bd. of San Antonio, 53 S.W.3d 310, 315 (Tex. 2001). We neither found nor received briefing purporting to find a statute expressly granting the Commission discretion to waive the section 1102.114(3) insurance requirement. Instead, we found a statute granting the Commission discretion to “waive any license requirement for an applicant who holds a license from another state having license requirements substantially equivalent to those of this state.” Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 1102.112 (West 2012). This specific grant of authority to waive certain license requirements indicates that the Legislature has not impliedly granted the Commission discretion to waive other license requirements, such as the section 1102.114(3) insurance requirement. See Jones v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 745 S.W.2d 901, 902 (Tex. 1988) (explaining that the Legislature’s naming of one thing generally excludes things not named and that a court may not add words to a statute that are not implied in the statute’s language). Because the Legislature neither expressly nor impliedly granted the Commission the power to waive the section 1102.114(3) liability insurance requirement, the Commission lacks discretion to waive that requirement.>

S U M M A R Y

Sections 1102.114(3) and 1102.203(a) require an applicant for a real estate inspector’s license to carry liability insurance. The Texas Real Estate Commission lacks authority to waive that requirement.

Very truly yours,

Abbott signatureGREG ABBOTT
Attorney General of Texas

Daniel T. Hodge
First Assistant Attorney General

James D. Blacklock
Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel

Jason Boatright
Chair, Opinion Committee

Jason Boatright
Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee

Footnotes

1. Letter from Douglas E. Oldmixon, Adm’r, Tex. Real Estate Comm’n, to the Honorable Greg Abbott, Tex. Att’y Gen. at 2 (Oct. 11, 2011), http://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/opin (“Request Letter”).

2. Of course, the Legislature may amend section 1102.114(3) to make the insurance requirement contingent on the availability of the required insurance. Tex. Const. art. III, § 1. An opinion of this office, however, cannot. Id. art. II, § 1. See also Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. GA-0781 (2010) at 3 (explaining that “we will not add words that are not implicitly contained in the language of a statute”) (citing Lee v. City of Houston, 807 S.W.2d 290, 294-95 (Tex. 1991)).

 


Home | Opinions

 

 

Hold “Ctrl” key to open in new window:

SoP’s 535.227-.233 Review Work 03-27-2012 Draft Work

Hold “Ctrl” key to open in new window:

REI 7-3 form work 03-27-2012 with Inspected checkbox

Hold “Ctrl” key to open in new window:

Rules for Inspection Report Form 3-27-2012

Share with others:
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
Posted in Inspections, Inspector Advisory Committee, TREC | Leave a comment
divider

E&O Provider Feud?

What’s this I’m hearing about a conflict between two Texas E&O providers? Is one really bad-mouthing and spreading falsehoods about the other’s policy coverage? Surely that can’t be true Confused smile.

Share with others:
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
Posted in E&O Insurance | 1 Comment
divider

Recent Inspector Lawsuit Appeal Ruling

A recent Texas inspection lawsuit appeal ruling may help shield inspectors from lawsuits claiming Deceptive Trade Practices Act violations. Brokers & sales agents are already afforded that protection. View the ruling here.

Share with others:
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
Posted in E&O Insurance, Regulatory | Leave a comment
divider

Proposed Commentary

TREC has posted the following on their website:

The Texas Real Estate Commission is seeking input from inspectors and the public on a recommendation to post a set of comments to the Standards of Practice for inspectors as one of several optional examination preparation resources listed on the inspector examination page of the TREC website. This set of comments is proposed to be added to that location and posted with the following notice: “These comments are not an official interpretation of the Standards of Practice and should not be relied on as such.”
Click pdf iconhere to view the document.

If that is the final destination and the Commentary does not become part of the SOP nor a separate enforceable Rule then I would support that idea.

Share with others:
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
Posted in Inspector Advisory Committee, Regulatory, Training, TREC | Leave a comment
divider

Upcoming TAREI Ethics & SOP Seminar

OK, read the gist of the recent e-mail invitation that TAREI is sending out advertising their upcoming TREC mandated Ethics/SOP Continuing Education requirement for HI license renewals.

The TAREI Invite

Join speakers such as J.D. Fuller, Billy Anderson, and Larry Battarbee as they present the required ethics training and how the ethics relate to our SOP’s.  Billy Anderson, attorney with Kent, Good, Anderson, and Bush, will present the legal side of the ethics and SOP’s.  Larry Battarbee will relate how the ethics and SOP’s relate to E&O insurance.

Lunch WILL be provided courtesy of Larry Battarbee with Battarbee Insurance.

My Opinion
Well, I’m going to let you Comment on this and then I’ll share my personal opinion.

Share with others:
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
Posted in Regulatory, Training, TREC | 3 Comments
divider

INACHI & TPREIA team up

INACHI & TPREIA announced a partnership last Friday that is reminiscent of last year’s bungled INACHI/TAREI alliance. So far the response from Texas inspectors has been something like this: Response

Share with others:
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
Posted in Trade Associations | 4 Comments
divider

Proposed E&O Scenario Opinion from AG

At the October 10, 2011 TREC meeting Adm Oldmixon requested approval from the commission to ask for the Attorney General’s opinion on a certain Inspector’s E&O scenario, i.e. what would happen if there were no providers of E&O for Texas inspectors. Click the Opinion Letter tab to read the proposed letter to the AG.

Proposed AG Opinion letter

AG Opinion EO

My Opinion

The first question posed to the AG is to whether E&O insurance would still be required even if no insurance company offered it in Texas. The answer to that will be Yes, that requirement is prescribed by legislation and can only be rescinded by further legislation. The simple fact of insurance providers theoretically not offering E&O will not likely change the law, that would have to be done separately. If the AG did not see fit to provide that opinion then most likely his office will state they cannot speculate on such theoretical scenarios. The answer to the second question of whether TREC has the authority to waive the requirement would, in my opinion, be a resounding No.

AG Opinion letter status

As of 10/13, I have not confirmed that the Commission approved of sending the letter to the AG, I’m working on that.

Share with others:
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
Posted in E&O Insurance, Legislation, Regulatory, TREC, Uncategorized | 7 Comments
divider

Trade Association Message Board

There’s a certain trade association message board that I’ve frequented for over 7 years. Historically, it has been a good place to pose questions and also answer other’s questions on technical HI topics. Not so much anymore though. Continue reading

Share with others:
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
Posted in Inspections, Trade Associations | 2 Comments
divider

TREC SOP Sub-Committee 09/20/11 Conf Call

Participated today on the Conf Call with the Sub-Committee working on changes to the TREC Inspection SOP.  Appeared to be a reasonably productive call. Many changes being made to “clean up” the SOP and minimize several of the redundant comments throughout.

There is still the conundrum of the SOP saying we don’t inspect to “code” but still notes “code”.  My view is that we have to be working from a basis of general fact/recognition and (to me) that is the related “code” … be it NEC, IRC and so on.

The “non-inspector” committee member made some very good observations and very succinctly pointed out some items that we (as inspectors) face daily. John C. will likely add value to that comment along with other views of the call.

There is plenty more work to do on the SOP and the next conf call is tentatively set for 10/25/11.

 

Share with others:
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
Posted in Inspector Advisory Committee, TREC | 1 Comment
divider