<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Welcome to Capital City Inspections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.capcityinspections.com/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.capcityinspections.com/blog</link>
	<description>Keeping Texas Inspectors Informed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 13:42:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recent AG Ruling by Mike Boyett</title>
		<link>http://www.capcityinspections.com/blog/?p=1567#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Boyett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 13:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capcityinspections.com/blog/?p=1567#comment-542</guid>
		<description>Yeah, many folks do feel that way. I&#039;m not sure of the answer though.&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, many folks do feel that way. I&#8217;m not sure of the answer though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recent AG Ruling by Bruce Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.capcityinspections.com/blog/?p=1567#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 03:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capcityinspections.com/blog/?p=1567#comment-541</guid>
		<description>Mike,Thanks for the head&#039;s up. &#160;I guess my question is: &#160;why? &#160;Why send those questions to the AG?I mean, who couldn&#039;t see his answer coming from a mile away? &#160;Seemed like a waste of time on both sides.My .02 cents, Bruce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,Thanks for the head&#8217;s up. &nbsp;I guess my question is: &nbsp;why? &nbsp;Why send those questions to the AG?I mean, who couldn&#8217;t see his answer coming from a mile away? &nbsp;Seemed like a waste of time on both sides.My .02 cents, Bruce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on E&amp;O Provider Feud? by Nolan Kienitz</title>
		<link>http://www.capcityinspections.com/blog/?p=1512#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>Nolan Kienitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capcityinspections.com/blog/?p=1512#comment-530</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m guessing it may just be one provider putting out some false-hoods in an attempt to get more business himself. It boils down to market share and customer service. The one provider causing the &quot;stir&quot; has been known to talk bad about his competition in an effort to build himself up. &#160;Not a good business model in my view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guessing it may just be one provider putting out some false-hoods in an attempt to get more business himself. It boils down to market share and customer service. The one provider causing the &#8220;stir&#8221; has been known to talk bad about his competition in an effort to build himself up. &nbsp;Not a good business model in my view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Upcoming TAREI Ethics &amp; SOP Seminar by Emmanuel Scanlan</title>
		<link>http://www.capcityinspections.com/blog/?p=1460#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>Emmanuel Scanlan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 03:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capcityinspections.com/blog/?p=1460#comment-496</guid>
		<description>The inspection industry in Texas is fraught with shady dealings, shady persons, and shady leadership if you want to call it leadership.&#160; That attitude trickles down to the way the shady people deal with the consumers.&#160; Until the shady activity in Texas is stopped, or at least significantly curtailed, then the inspection industry will always be looked down on and treated as such.&#160; The problem is the ones responsible for stopping it are doing nothing more than promoting the shady activity!&#160; Everything is BIG in Texas and shady activity is no exception to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The inspection industry in Texas is fraught with shady dealings, shady persons, and shady leadership if you want to call it leadership.&nbsp; That attitude trickles down to the way the shady people deal with the consumers.&nbsp; Until the shady activity in Texas is stopped, or at least significantly curtailed, then the inspection industry will always be looked down on and treated as such.&nbsp; The problem is the ones responsible for stopping it are doing nothing more than promoting the shady activity!&nbsp; Everything is BIG in Texas and shady activity is no exception to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Upcoming TAREI Ethics &amp; SOP Seminar by Mike Boyett</title>
		<link>http://www.capcityinspections.com/blog/?p=1460#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Boyett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capcityinspections.com/blog/?p=1460#comment-495</guid>
		<description>OK, still a lot of readers but not many commenters. I believe that if a person &#039;takes up a cause&#039; and tries to persuade a large group of interested parties, i.e. Texas inspectors, then to do so anonymously is shady, perhaps even unethical, especially when they have a monetary, vested interest in the outcome.&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, still a lot of readers but not many commenters. I believe that if a person &#8216;takes up a cause&#8217; and tries to persuade a large group of interested parties, i.e. Texas inspectors, then to do so anonymously is shady, perhaps even unethical, especially when they have a monetary, vested interest in the outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Upcoming TAREI Ethics &amp; SOP Seminar by Nolan Kienitz</title>
		<link>http://www.capcityinspections.com/blog/?p=1460#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>Nolan Kienitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capcityinspections.com/blog/?p=1460#comment-490</guid>
		<description>Marketing, marketing on the insurance guy&#039;s part. Problem is that most of the attendees won&#039;t link the prior shady connections with that insurance representative. They are getting a &quot;free&quot; lunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marketing, marketing on the insurance guy&#8217;s part. Problem is that most of the attendees won&#8217;t link the prior shady connections with that insurance representative. They are getting a &#8220;free&#8221; lunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Proposed E&amp;O Scenario Opinion from AG by Mike Boyett</title>
		<link>http://www.capcityinspections.com/blog/?p=1423#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Boyett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 03:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capcityinspections.com/blog/?p=1423#comment-486</guid>
		<description>No, I have not heard officially if the Commissioners approved Doug&#039;s request to send the letter to the AG. I can&#039;t imagine that they did not approve it. The next TREC meeting is 12/5, maybe an update will be given then. It takes 3-6 months to get an AG reply.&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I have not heard officially if the Commissioners approved Doug&#8217;s request to send the letter to the AG. I can&#8217;t imagine that they did not approve it. The next TREC meeting is 12/5, maybe an update will be given then. It takes 3-6 months to get an AG reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trade Association Message Board by Nolan Kienitz</title>
		<link>http://www.capcityinspections.com/blog/?p=1411#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>Nolan Kienitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 01:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capcityinspections.com/blog/?p=1411#comment-485</guid>
		<description>That board has again gone over the edge with some postings.&#160; I even tried to post something the other day (I&#039;m not a member of that particular TA) and my post was deleted within minutes.&#160; I guess my straight-forward comment about the topic and some involved with it was simply not going to be tolerated.&#160; Oh well. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That board has again gone over the edge with some postings.&nbsp; I even tried to post something the other day (I&#8217;m not a member of that particular TA) and my post was deleted within minutes.&nbsp; I guess my straight-forward comment about the topic and some involved with it was simply not going to be tolerated.&nbsp; Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Proposed E&amp;O Scenario Opinion from AG by Nolan Kienitz</title>
		<link>http://www.capcityinspections.com/blog/?p=1423#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Nolan Kienitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 01:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capcityinspections.com/blog/?p=1423#comment-484</guid>
		<description>Any movement by TREC to send this along to the AG?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any movement by TREC to send this along to the AG?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on INACHI &amp; TPREIA team up by Nolan Kienitz</title>
		<link>http://www.capcityinspections.com/blog/?p=1443#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator>Nolan Kienitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 01:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capcityinspections.com/blog/?p=1443#comment-483</guid>
		<description>I think the crickets still have the lead in this one ... save for some of the leaders posting &quot;atta-boys&quot; to each other at various realtor-focus sites.&#160; Certainly have not heard of any (repeat ANY) positive comments from the actual inspector community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the crickets still have the lead in this one &#8230; save for some of the leaders posting &#8220;atta-boys&#8221; to each other at various realtor-focus sites.&nbsp; Certainly have not heard of any (repeat ANY) positive comments from the actual inspector community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

